Home › Tag Archives › gop presidential candidates

Gingrich reveals income, but not how he earned it (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich beat his main GOP presidential rival, Mitt Romney, to the punch by releasing his most recent tax return. But Gingrich still hasn’t revealed how he earned most of his $3.1 million.

The 2010 tax return made public last week shows that $2.4 million, more than three-fourths of Gingrich’s income, came in payments he regularly received, in addition to his salary, from different businesses he ran before announcing his candidacy for president. Those businesses managed speaking engagements, appearance fees, consulting work, book and video deals and paid positions that Gingrich held in other groups.

Gingrich, who has demanded more transparency from Romney, doesn’t identify where the money came from, including amounts he received from his consulting business.

The Associated Press requested details about Gingrich’s income and the identities of who paid him for his services. The campaign has not decided whether it will release further information about Gingrich’s income, spokesman R.C. Hammond said.

Other GOP presidential candidates, including Romney and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have provided details of such income. Romney’s financial reports filed last year and his 2010 tax return released this week specify groups that paid him for appearances and how much he received. Santorum, who has yet to release his tax return, lists on a financial report the businesses that paid him as a consultant, payments he received serving on specific boards and activist groups, and money he earned as a FOX News contributor and a newspaper columnist.

The way Gingrich has earned a living in recent years has become an avenue for political attack by Romney. Romney charges that the $1.65 million Gingrich received from the government-backed mortgage company Freddie Mac from 1999 to 2007 was for influence peddling, which Gingrich has denied. Romney also has demanded that Gingrich identify other clients who paid for his services and what he did for them, accusing Gingrich of “potentially wrongful activity.”

“If you’re getting paid by health companies, if your entities are getting paid by health companies that could benefit from a piece of legislation, and you then meet with Republican congressmen and encourage them to support that legislation, you can call it whatever you’d like. I call it influence-peddling,” Romney told Gingrich.

Gingrich has accused Romney of attacking his consulting work out of political desperation, hoping to stifle Gingrich’s rising popularity among GOP voters. Gingrich said he has never been a lobbyist.

But he is battling the perception that he was selling his influence, if not actually lobbying, as he campaigns to win Florida’s GOP presidential primary on Tuesday. Gingrich has said he was exercising his rights as a citizen, not a lobbyist, in 2003 when he publicly advocated changes in Medicare. And he’s argued that he and his group, which received millions from dozens of health-related businesses, made sure not to cross the line into lobbying when he met with congressional members and others to promote the Medicare changes sought by then President George W. Bush.

A liberal-leaning watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, is urging a federal investigation of Gingrich’s activities.

“Mr. Gingrich’s claim that he simply engaged in `public advocacy’ doesn’t pass the smell test,” said Melanie Sloan, the group’s executive director. “Mr. Gingrich was a lobbyist, and he should not be allowed to play word games with the American people.”

To make its case that Gingrich was lobbying, Sloan’s group cites the Lobbying Disclosure Act, which defines a lobbyist as someone who receives payment for services from a client, makes more than one lobbying contact for the client on an issue and spends at least 20 percent of their time in a three-month period on lobbying activities. A lobbying contact is defined as communication on behalf of a client regarding “the formulation, modification or adoption of federal legislation.”

Gingrich’s tax return doesn’t show how much money he received as a consultant working through his Gingrich Group and his Center for Health Transformation. The center urges changes to health-related policies and laws, practices and technology but says it “does not provide lobbying services nor directly or indirectly participate in lobbying activities of any kind.” Instead, all of Gingrich’s income is lumped together as $2.4 million in payments from Gingrich Holdings, a sort of parent company managing his interests in other businesses.

The Center for Health Transformation served more than 100 companies in 2010, with some paying as much as $200,000 a year to join Gingrich’s organization. While the center has said it generated $55 million from hundreds of corporate sponsors from 2001 to 2010 with Gingrich leading the effort, it said it won’t release a list of clients due to confidentiality clauses in its contracts.

Last year as he prepared for the presidential run, Gingrich sold his interest in the Gingrich Group and the Center for Health Transformation. He hasn’t said how much he received in the buyout, but his financial disclosure form shows his Gingrich Productions is owed between $5 million and $25 million from the Gingrich Group.

Gingrich’s tax return also doesn’t show how much he received from his Fox News contract as a frequent on-air contributor. That contract was managed by Gingrich Communications, a business that handles his appearances and speaking engagements.

Last fall when Gingrich was first denying ever working as a lobbyist, he told a South Carolina audience that he didn’t need to walk the halls of Congress to make a living because of the bounty he received in speaking fees.

“I’m going to be really direct, OK? I was charging $60,000 a speech. And the number of speeches was going up, not down,” he said.

Gingrich has not identified the groups that paid him for those speeches.

Gingrich also continued to earn money as an author, although it’s not clear how much of his earnings came from payments received by Gingrich Communications from his books.

While the $2.4 million in Gingrich’s business payments are not detailed, the tax return does identify more than $712,000 of other income:

_$252,500 for his salary from Gingrich Holdings;

_$191,827 for his wife’s salary from Gingrich Productions and $5,918 from the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington as a member of the church’s professional choir;

_$76,200 for his congressional pension;

_$72,274 from his share of his daughter’s business;

_$38,637 for dividend and interest payments;

_$33,124 in tax refunds;

_$21,625 in speaking fees paid directly to Gingrich and not his businesses;

_$20,000 for him and his wife for serving on boards of directors. The boards are not identified.

___

Follow Blackledge on Twitter: http://twitter.com/brettblackledge

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120126/ap_on_el_pr/us_gingrich_income

annie annie zuccotti park leymah gbowee hunger games trailer hunger games trailer austin rivers

Boehner calls GOP deficit plan a ‘fair offer’

In this Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 photo, from left to right, GOP presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum stand at the CBS News/National Journal foreign policy debate at the Benjamin Johnson Arena, in Spartanburg, S.C. (AP Photo/The Spartanburg Herald-Journal, Tim Kimzey)

In this Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 photo, from left to right, GOP presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum stand at the CBS News/National Journal foreign policy debate at the Benjamin Johnson Arena, in Spartanburg, S.C. (AP Photo/The Spartanburg Herald-Journal, Tim Kimzey)

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va. gestures during a news briefing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Nov. 14, 2011. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

(AP) ? The top Republican in the House says a recent proposal by GOP members of a special deficit committee is a “fair offer” despite criticism from conservatives who say it breaks the party’s pledge on taxes.

“It’s important for us in my opinion to reform the tax code,” said Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, adding that a tax overhaul would “make America more competitive and produce economic growth.”

And a top GOP member of the panel got some words of support from House Republicans Tuesday morning after briefing rank-and-file Republicans on last week’s GOP proposal, which called for a net tax revenue increase of almost $300 billion in exchange for significantly lowered tax rates.

Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, co-chairman of the deficit panel said the badly divided group is still working in hopes of reaching an agreement.

“They haven’t thrown me out, so I guess I got a good reception,” Hensarling said of how House Republicans reacted to his status report on supercommittee talks. “I gave them an update, I told them we haven’t lost hope yet but … this week is crucial.”

The panel faces an official target of next Wednesday to approve a plan, but sometime this week is a more realistic deadline, given the realities of drafting proposals into legal language and getting them “scored” by congressional analysts to measure their impact on the deficit.

Hensarling, a stout conservative, got support from some of his colleagues inside a closed-door GOP caucus Tuesday morning. He pointed out that a far larger tax increase looms at the end of next year with the expiration of the Bush-era cuts in tax rates, investments, and breaks for married couples and families with children.

“I thought it was a very serious effort in trying to break a logjam and get a compromise,” said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis. “Held up against the big tax increase coming, I’ll take that any day.

But last week’s GOP plan has gotten a cold shoulder from GOP presidential hopefuls like former Speaker Newt Gingrich and Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

Campaigning in Iowa, Gingrich said he would “do everything in my power to defeat” any committee deficit-reduction plan that includes higher taxes.

Jason Miner, a spokesman for Perry, said the Texas governor “wants to look at details but if those details include a tax increase he’s not going to be for it. He does not favor higher taxes.”

Some conservative Republicans are restive about last week’s GOP proposal for higher tax revenues, which would be skimmed off the top in a future overhaul of the tax code that trades the elimination of many tax breaks for significantly lower income tax rates.

“I would still be concerned about any proposal that basically would violate a pledge on raising taxes,” said Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J.

The committee has been at work for two months, hoping to succeed at a task that has defied the best efforts of high-ranking political leaders past and present.

The principal stumbling blocks revolve around taxes, on the one hand, and the large federal benefit programs of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, on the other.

Democrats are unwilling to agree to cuts in benefit programs unless Republicans will accept higher taxes, particularly on the highest-income individuals and families.

“I’m willing to make significant inroads into, for example, some of the mandatory programs, which include Medicare and Medicaid, but that comes as part of a big deal where everyone shares in the sacrifice,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., a liberal member of the panel.

Republicans counter that out-of-control spending largely accounts for the government’s enormous budget deficits, and they say raising taxes will only complicate efforts to help the economy recover from the worst recession in more than seven decades.

At the same time, each side is grappling with the possible political consequences of the committee’s work, with an eye on the 2012 campaign for control of the White House and Congress.

Liberal Democrats are highly reluctant to agree to curbs on programs the party long has been identified with, and last week members on the supercommittee jettisoned an earlier proposal to slow the rise in cost-of-living benefits for Social Security recipients.

The same goes for conservatives, many of whom fear the possible political cost of changing their positions in order to pursue a less-than-certain bipartisan compromise on deficit reduction.

Many GOP officeholders have signed a pledge circulated by Americans for Tax Reform not to vote for higher taxes. The organization is led by Grover Norquist, a conservative activist, although in comments to reporters Cantor suggested that influence by an outsider isn’t the dominant concern.

“It’s not about Grover Norquist. It’s about commitments that people made to the electorate they represent, the people that sent them here. That’s what it’s about,” he said.

Conservative blogger Erick Erickson, whose views carry weight with GOP lawmakers, weighed in Tuesday with a blunt attack on the proposed Republican compromise on taxes.

“The Republicans who back in June were telling us they would hold the line on tax increases have decided that they must have tax increases,” Erickson wrote in a Tuesday morning post.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/apdefault/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2011-11-15-Debt%20Supercommittee/id-0b2a1e62c6f04d50bbae9856053e516f

do a barrel roll jimmy kimmel tilt do a barrel roll. florida state football florida state football fsu football